Daily Podcasts Video Research

Changing Sex Is Like Taking an Aspirin?

JL;DR SUMMARY The episode discusses the legal and social implications of a Supreme Court case concerning gender-affirming care for minors, highlighting various opinions among justices. A way out west there was a fella, fella I want to tell you about, fella by the name of Jeff Lebowski.

  • At least, that was the handle his lovin' parents gave him, but he never had much use for it himself.
  • This Lebowski, he called himself the Dude.
  • Now, Dude, that's a name no one would self-apply where I come from.
  • But then, there was a lot about the Dude that didn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
  • And a lot about where he lived, likewise. But then again, maybe that's why I found the place s'durned innarestin'.
JL;DR members get full summaries and key points of all podcast episodes in the archive, including this one. Donate & listen smarter »

Tags

Supreme CourtBiden AdministrationGender IdentityGender Affirming CareTransgender IssuesConservative JusticesPardonsLegal EthicsLegal PrecedentsPolitical Accountability

Places mentioned

Tennessee, United States
"In the case of Scrimetti v. The United States, this is the case involving the Tennessee law restricting the use of quote, gender-affirming care to adolescents and people under the age of 18."
England, United Kingdom
"Alito wanted to bring up and kept bringing up the fact that in Europe, where this has been more extensively where transgender surgeries for youth have been much more prevalent, that European countries have been reversing themselves, in particular Great Britain, reversing themselves on the laws and rules regulating this kind of behavior."
This podcast episode was indexed and curated by Cairo, JL;DR's web crawler.
Cairo Item ID 37993
Cairo Source ID 60
Retrieved 2024-12-06 05:30:41 UTC
Curated 2024-12-06 06:06:57 UTC