Daily Podcasts Video Research

When Artificial Intelligence Came to Life in 18th-Century Amsterdam

JL;DR SUMMARY Rabbi Yosie Levine explores the groundbreaking work of Hakham Tsevi Ashkenazi, the 18th-century Ashkenazic Chief Rabbi of Amsterdam, who examined the halakhic status of the golem in his magnum opus of responsa. A way out west there was a fella, fella I want to tell you about, fella by the name of Jeff Lebowski. At least, that was the handle his lovin' parents gave him, but he never had much use for it himself. This Lebowski, he called himself the Dude. Now, Dude, that's a name no one would self-apply where I come from. But then, there was a lot about the Dude that didn't make a whole lot of sense to me. And a lot about where he lived, likewise. But then again, maybe that's why I found the place s'durned innarestin'.

JL;DR members get full summaries of all articles in the archive, including this one. Donate & start reading »

Tags

Artificial IntelligenceGolemMinyanJewish MysticismHalakhic ImplicationsRabbinic ControversyRabbi Yosie LevineHalakhic DiscourseTalmudic TraditionHakham Tsevi

Places mentioned

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
"While serving as the Ashkenazic Chief Rabbi of Amsterdam in 1712, Hakham Tsevi Ashkenazi (1658-1718) published a collection of his responsa that would be known to posterity as his magnum opus."
Prague, Prague, Hlavní mešto, Czechia
"Surely none is more famous than the one whose creation was ascribed to R. Judah Loew ben Bezalel (d. 1609). The golem of Prague, a legend that originated in the first decades of the 19th century, spawned a whole genre of literature and art."
Hamburg, Germany
"Tzvi Ashkenazi (1658-1718), Chief Rabbi of Hamburg, artist unknownThe Jewish Museum, London."
London, United Kingdom
"Tzvi Ashkenazi (1658-1718), Chief Rabbi of Hamburg, artist unknownThe Jewish Museum, London."
Lublin, Poland
"Even prior to the technological innovations that would occasion a new series of debates, however, this ruling met with opposition. R. Tsadok Hakohen of Lublin (1823-1900) adopted the most radical position and maintained that the golem should in fact be considered human."

Support this source

This item was indexed and curated by Cairo, JL;DR's web crawler.
Cairo Item ID 58090
Cairo Source ID 10
Retrieved 2025-07-30 05:31:41 UTC
Curated 2025-07-30 08:34:18 UTC