JL;DR

Daily Podcasts Video

Tag: War Crimes

0

Israel and the International Criminal Court; The Power of Music

People of the Pod · 19 Feb 2021

In a recent development, the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague has declared its jurisdiction in the West Bank and Gaza, thereby potentially enabling the prosecution of Israelis for alleged war crimes.

0

The “Courts: Of Public Opinion & the Other Kind” Edition

Promised Podcast · 11 Feb 2021

In this podcast episode, the hosts discuss three topics: the growing respect for Israeli politician Yair Lapid, the International Criminal Court's decision to hold Israelis accountable for war crimes, and the emergence of new political magazines aiming to influence Israeli politics.

0 Politics Israel

The “Courts: Of Public Opinion & the Other Kind” Edition

Promised Podcast · 11 Feb 2021

Allison Kaplan Sommer, Don Futterman, and Noah Efron discuss Yair Lapid's political credibility, the International Criminal Court's ruling on Israel and Palestine, and new political magazines attempting to influence Israeli politics via mail.

0 Politics History

Justice, Justice He Pursued - In the Hague

Tel Aviv Review · 22 Dec 2017

Sir Geoffrey Nice, known for prosecuting war criminal Slobodan Milosevic, discusses international justice in his book "Justice for All and How to Achieve It," questioning if systems like the Hague can truly promote peace or if they are predominantly victor's justice.

0 Israel Politics

The "War Crimes & Misdemeanors" Edition

Promised Podcast · 25 Jun 2015

In this edition, Allison, Don, and Noah discuss Michael Oren's controversial essays, the UN report on war crimes during the Gaza conflict, and the potential leadership shift in the Israeli left involving Ron Huldai challenging Yitzhak Herzog.

0 Israel Jewish Law

Friendly Fire: A Response and Rejoinder

Peter Berkowitz in Jewish Review of Books · 27 Feb 2013

In response to a review by Jeremy Rabkin, the author acknowledges praise for his book on Israel's adherence to international laws of war but criticizes Rabkin for misrepresenting his arguments and advocating for the overthrow rather than reform of these laws.