Wikipedia has decided that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is not a reliable source on the Israel-Palestine conflict, a decision made by three editors who cited the ADL's dual role as a research and advocacy organization.

In a recent development on Wikipedia, editors voted to declare the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as an unreliable source for content related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The Wikimedia Foundation, which oversees Wikipedia, declined to intervene in editors' decision to label the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as unreliable on Israel and Zionism.

Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, expressed concerns about Wikipedia's bias after the site rated ADL's information on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as generally unreliable.

In response to Wikipedia labeling the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as generally unreliable regarding the Israel-Palestinian conflict and antisemitism, there is a call for self-reflection within the ADL.

Wikipedia editors have labeled the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as generally unreliable on Israeli-Palestinian matters and antisemitism, arguing that the organization's pro-Israel stance may bias its reporting.

Wikipedia editors have recently banned the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) citing concerns about its reliability on both the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and antisemitism.

The Arabic version of Wikipedia has been accused of containing misinformation and biased content regarding the Israel-Hamas conflict.

The article discusses the problem of misinformation and inaccuracies on Wikipedia, with examples such as false statements about historical figures and events.

As the commemoration of Yom ha-Shoah unfolds in Poland, a debate is raging over the country's Holocaust history narrative.

A new study published in The Journal of Holocaust Research reveals that Wikipedia intentionally distorts and spreads false information about the Holocaust.